How to Manage Pests

Pests in Gardens and Landscapes

Elm Leaf Beetle

Published 2/04

In this Guideline:

PDF to Print

Adult, eggs, and first instar larva of elm leaf beetle.

Adult, eggs, and first instar larva of elm leaf beetle.

Third-instar elm leaf beetle larvae.

Third-instar elm leaf beetle larvae.

Elm leaf beetle prepupae, pupae, and pupae of parasite Erynniopsis antennata.

Elm leaf beetle prepupae, pupae, and pupae of parasite Erynniopsis antennata.

Damage due to elm leaf beetle.

Damage due to elm leaf beetle.

Elm leaf beetle, Xanthogaleruca (=Pyrrhalta) luteola, is one of the most important insects damaging urban forests in the United States and is the major pest of elm trees in California.


Adults are olive-green beetles with black, longitudinal stripes along the margin and center of the back. Females lay their yellowish to gray eggs in double rows of about 5 to 25 on the underside of leaves. Larvae are black when newly hatched. After feeding, they become a dull yellow or green with rows of tiny dark tubercles (projections). Larvae develop through three stages called instars. Third-instar larvae have dense rows of dark tubercles that resemble two black stripes down their sides, making them easy to distinguish from first- and second-instar larvae. Mature third instars are up to 1/3 inch long. Pupae are orange to bright yellow.


Adults commonly overwinter in bark crevices, litter, woodpiles, or in buildings. They fly to foliage in spring, and feed and lay yellowish eggs, which become grayish before hatching. After feeding in the canopy for several weeks, mature larvae crawl down the tree trunk, become curled, inactive prepupae, and then develop into yellowish pupae. After about 10 days, adult beetles emerge from pupae around the tree base and fly to the canopy to feed and (during spring and summer) lay eggs. Elm leaf beetle has at least one generation a year in northern California and two to three generations in central and southern California.


Elm leaf beetle is a serious defoliator of elms. Larvae skeletonize the leaf surface, while adults chew entirely through the leaf, often in a shothole pattern. Defoliation eliminates summer shade, reduces the aesthetic value of trees, and causes annoying leaf drop. Repeated, extensive defoliation weakens elms, causing trees to decline.


Manage elm leaf beetle with an integrated program that incorporates good cultural practices, conservation of natural enemies, regular monitoring, the use of less-toxic insecticides, bark banding with insecticides, or systemic insecticides.

Recognize that elm leaf beetle populations fluctuate dramatically from year-to-year and most trees do not require treatment every year. When beetles are present, otherwise healthy elms can tolerate substantial defoliation. Where elm leaf beetle is a problem, use a combination of methods because no single method kills 100% of the pests. Relying solely on the same technique year-after-year selects for pest populations less susceptible to that treatment. Because adult beetles fly from tree to tree, management efforts directed at single trees may give less satisfactory results in comparison with control efforts aimed at all elms in an area. Because elms are large trees, any pesticide spraying is best done by a professional applicator.

Cultural Control

Good cultural care of trees is an essential component of integrated pest management. European and American elm species are adapted to summer rainfall; they require proper irrigation to grow well in California. Protect trunks and roots from injury. Check for dead or dying branches and properly prune these out during late fall and winter. Avoid pruning elms during spring and summer; fresh pruning wounds attract feeding during these seasons by the European elm bark beetle (Scolytus multistriatus), which vectors Dutch elm disease (Ophiostoma [=Ceratocystis] ulmi and O. novo-ulmi). English elm (Ulmus procera) and Scotch elm (U. glabra) are especially susceptible to both elm leaf beetle and Dutch elm disease (Table 1). Do not plant these species and consider replacing them in areas where they are growing.

Table 1. Susceptibility of Elms and Elm Substitutes to Elm Leaf Beetle (ELB) and Dutch Elm Disease (DED).
Common name Scientific name ELB DED
English elm Ulmus procera HS HS
Scotch elm U. glabra HS HS
American elm U. americana S HS
'Homestead' complex hybrid including
U. carpinifolia,
U. hollandica, and U. pumila
'Liberty' group
    American elms
U. americana selections S1 MR
'New Horizon' and
'Valley Forge'
    American elms2
U. americana selections S1 R
'Pioneer' U. glabra X U. carpinifolia S R
Siberian elm U. pumila S MR
'Frontier' U. carpinifolia X U. parvifolia MR3 R
Chinese elm U. parvifolia R4 MR
'Prospector' U. wilsoniana selection R R
zelkova Zelkova serrata R MR
hackberry Celtis spp. NS NS
hornbeam Carpinus spp. NS NS
Trees are listed in order by susceptibility.
HS = highly susceptible   R = resistant
S = susceptible   NS = not susceptible
MR = moderately resistant        
1  Generally susceptible to elm leaf beetle, but certain selections exhibit some resistance.
2  American elm selections resistant to Dutch elm disease have exhibited poor growth structure when grown in California.
3  Reported susceptibility to elm leaf beetle ranges from susceptible to resistant, possibly due to location, genetic variability among plants, or misidentification of elms.
4  ’Dynasty’ Chinese elm is highly susceptible to elm leaf beetle.
Treatment Thresholds

Using treatment thresholds to determine if control is needed helps minimize unnecessary insecticide applications, avoids or reduces annoyance from beetle damage, and protects elms, especially when trees are already stressed or unhealthy from other causes. Healthy elm trees can tolerate substantial damage to leaves; even total defoliation may have little long-term effect on healthy elms, especially if leaf damage comes late in the season. Suggested treatment thresholds are 40% defoliation (portion of leaf area chewed or leaves dropped prematurely) or 20% defoliation if damage is less tolerable.


When using insecticide bark bands, foliar sprays, or trunk injection of a systemic insecticide, monitor elm trees to determine the need for treatments and when to apply them. Evaluate beetle populations during spring by inspecting foliage weekly for beetles starting in April. Watch for the appearance of yellowish eggs, which darken before hatching. If trunk injections of systemic insecticides (e.g., abamectin or imidacloprid) are the planned control method for a large number of trees, consider using egg presence-absence sampling and injecting the trees as soon as monitoring indicates thresholds will be exceeded. If a foliar insecticide application is planned, spray when early instar (small) larvae are abundant. Band bark with an insecticide before mature larvae crawl down trunks to pupate, which in California may occur from early May to late June, depending on the location and weather. Inspect foliage weekly during May and June and band as soon as mature larvae are observed on leaves. The calendar date of peak abundance of beetles and their damage and the optimal time for banding varies greatly from year-to-year, depending on spring temperatures. Monitoring temperature is highly recommended to more accurately time foliage inspection and control actions.

If an application of a soil systemic insecticide is planned, the optimal treatment time is before beetles are present and before knowing if beetles will be abundant enough to warrant control during the current or next generation of insects. Use several criteria to help decide if a preventive, soil-applied insecticide is warranted (Table 2). For example, inspect elms during late summer to early fall; if beetles and damage are low, especially on untreated elms, it is less likely that insecticide application will be needed the next season.

Table 2. Criteria to Help Decide if Preventive Systemic Insecticide Is Warranted for Elm Leaf Beetle Control.
Criteria Avoid treatment Treatment may be warranted
beetle populations and damage the previous late summer/early fall low population or damage high population or damage
treated the previous season yes no
overwintering weather wetter or warmer than average, or both drier or colder than average, or both

Although it has not been scientifically demonstrated, relatively warm and wet winters are believed to reduce the likelihood that beetles will be a problem the following spring. Wet winters can increase overwintering mortality of beetles from insect pathogenic fungi. Warm winters may cause many "hibernating" beetles to starve to death because warmer weather increases the rate at which these insects consume their stored energy (e.g., body fat), increasing the likelihood that beetles will become weakened or starve before elm leaves appear in spring. If elm leaf beetle damage was low the previous fall and the winter is warm and wet, avoid preventive insecticide application the following spring.

Degree-Day Monitoring

Insect activity and growth rate depend on temperature. Generally, the higher the temperature, the more rapid the development. Measuring heat over time provides a physiological time scale called degree-days that is more useful than calendar days for timing insect monitoring and control. Temperatures for many locations and relatively easy to use degree-day calculation tools are available for a number of pests.

One degree-day is defined as one degree above the threshold temperature maintained for a full day. The lower threshold for elm leaf beetle is 51.8°F (11°C). When temperatures are cooler, this pest does not feed, grow, or reproduce. To predict the peak abundance of each life stage, degree-days above 51.8°F are accumulated for elm leaf beetle each season beginning March 1 (Table 3).

Degree-days for elm leaf beetle can be calculated using the elm leaf beetle plant model or the elm leaf beetle degree-day table available on this Web site. Alternatively, dedicated devices can record temperatures and calculate degree-days. If temperature records are available, a programmable calculator, desktop computer, or printed charts for certain pests can also be used to calculate degree-days.

If populations are high and damage is anticipated, treatment options include injecting elms as soon as the need for treatment is predicted (based on monitoring egg abundance) or applying a trunk spray or foliar spray at about 700 degree-days (Table 4).

Table 3. Time of Peak Abundance (Mean ± Standard Deviation) of Elm Leaf Eggs and Larvae in Northern California Based on Degree-Day (DD) Monitoring.
First generation DD (F)
eggs 509 ±95
first-instar larvae 635 ±112
second-instar larvae 794 ±162
third-instar larvae 857 ±167
Second generation
eggs 1,715 ±167
first-instar larvae 1,962 ±131
second-instar larvae 2,055 ±158
third-instar larvae 2,129 ±162
Degree-days are above 51.8°F (11°C) accumulated from March 1. Adapted from Dahlsten et al. 1993.
Table 4. Timing of Elm Leaf Beetle Monitoring, Bark Banding, Foliar Sprays, or Systemic Insecticide Treatments Based on Degree-days (DD).
  When, if monitoring degree-days DD (F)
Action When DD (F) 1st
DD (F) 2nd
sample eggs once a week1 for several weeks after first-generation eggs appear in spring; repeat during second generation 329-689 1,535-1,895
Btt2 applied about twice at 7- to 10-day intervals first and second instars in spring 550-800 not recommended
single foliar spray peak density of first and second instars combined 700 not recommended
bark banding or trunk spray before earliest third instars crawl down trunk 700 2,000
systemic insecticide applied to soil during late winter or early spring3 not recommended
systemic insecticide implant or injection as soon as possible during spring if egg sampling during 329-689 DD indicates thresholds are exceeded not recommended
Actions listed in chronological order, except for systemic insecticide use. Degree-days are accumulated above 51.8°F from March 1. Adapted from Dahlsten et al. 1993.
1This technique is for professionals managing large numbers of elms and using egg presence-absence to predict treatment need.
2Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. tenebronis. Not registered in California.
3See Table 2 for treatment decision-making criteria.
Presence-Absence Sampling for Professionals

The percentage of 1-foot branch terminals infested with elm leaf beetle eggs can be used to determine treatment need when a large group of trees is being monitored. Using a threshold of 40% defoliation, treatment is warranted when over 45% of branch terminals have beetle eggs during the week when egg density is at its maximum during the first generation. If the preferred threshold is 20% defoliation, treatment is warranted when over 30% of branch terminals are egg-infested during the first generation. If monitoring second-generation eggs, the suggested treatment threshold is about 30% of terminals infested.

Use a pole pruner to clip two or more 1-foot terminals (samples) from each of eight locations in the lower canopy of each sample tree. The clippings should be taken from north, east, south, and west, in both the inner canopy (from trunk halfway to the drip line) and the outer canopy. Randomly select the trees to be sampled and sample those trees each week.

Examine the leaves on each sample and record whether eggs are present or absent. Once you observe the first eggs on a sample, there is no need to examine it further; record it as infested and move on to inspect the next terminal. To determine the percentage of samples (terminals) infested, divide the number of samples infested by the total number of samples inspected and multiply by 100. For more details on presence-absence egg sampling consult the publications by Dahlsten and others or Pests of Landscape Trees and Shrubs.

Biological Control

Several introduced and native natural enemies kill elm leaf beetles, but generally do not provide adequate control by themselves. The most important parasite in California is a small, black tachinid fly (Erynniopsis antennata) that emerges from mature beetle larvae. Its black to reddish, cylinder- or teardrop-shaped pupae occur during spring and summer at the base of trees among the yellowish beetle pupae. Erynniopsis antennata overwinters in adult beetles, emerging as adults in spring, although this is not readily observed. Unfortunately, the effectiveness of E. antennata is limited by Baryscapus (=Tetrastichus) erynniae, a secondary parasite (hyperparasitoid) that kills the beneficial parasite.

Two tiny wasps also parasitize elm leaf beetle. Oomyzus (=Tetrastichus) brevistigma parasitizes mature larvae and pupae; one or more small, round holes in beetle pupae may indicate that this parasite has emerged. An egg parasite, Oomyzus (=Tetrastichus) gallerucae, leaves round holes when it emerges from beetle eggs, which remain golden. When beetle larvae have emerged, the eggshell is whitish with more ragged holes. For illustrations and photographs of elm leaf beetle parasites, consult Natural Enemies Handbook.

Conserve these parasites and general predators by avoiding foliar applications of broad-spectrum insecticides; use less toxic materials or apply insecticide as bark bands in an integrated program to obtain maximum benefits from biological control.

Chemical Control

Methods for chemical control of elm leaf beetle include bark banding, soil applications, tree injection, or foliar spraying in spring after monitoring beetle abundance to determine treatment need. Avoid treatment unless necessary. Insecticides can have unintended effects, such as contaminating water or killing natural enemies and causing secondary pest outbreaks.

Bark Banding

Bark banding is an inexpensive and environmentally sound technique that involves spraying a small area of the tree trunk with an insecticide. Use a hand-pump sprayer or hydraulic sprayer at low pressure to spray a band of bark several feet wide around the first main branch crotch. Carbaryl (Sevin) is most commonly used and should be applied at the rate labeled for elm bark beetles (about 2% active ingredient). If trunk spraying is not listed on the label of the products available for home landscape use, it will be necessary to have the trunk application done by a licensed pesticide applicator. Do not use the rate labeled for foliar applications because this rate will not be effective as a trunk banding treatment. Pyrethroids (e.g., fluvalinate) also provide control. About one-half gallon of dilute material is applied on each large tree. The insecticide kills the larvae when they crawl down to pupate around the tree base after feeding in the canopy. By reducing the number of elm leaf beetles that pupate and emerge as adults, bark banding reduces damage by later beetle generations, especially when done to all nearby elms.

You can determine the best time to spray the trunk by inspecting the foliage and spraying when mature larvae are first observed, or for more accurate timing, by accumulating degree-days and spraying the trunk band when about 700 degree-days (above 51.8°F) have accumulated from March 1. A single application of carbaryl to the bark each spring can kill most larvae that crawl over it all season long. A second application may be necessary if substantial rain occurs after application, if trunks are frequently wetted by sprinklers, or if a less persistent material is used. To determine if the bark band is still effective, regularly inspect around the base of trees throughout the season. If many beetles have changed from greenish prepupae (the stage killed by banding) to bright yellowish pupae (unaffected beetles), another application may be warranted.

Bark banding alone will not provide satisfactory control in all situations, especially if only one or a few trees are treated. Adult beetles can fly between treated and untreated trees, so bark banding is most effective when done on all the elm trees in a neighborhood. Also, overwintered adults fly to the tree canopy and lay eggs, so trunk banding does not reduce the first generation of beetles and their damage. A study of elm trees in northern California found good control during the first season of bark banding on Siberian elms (Ulmus pumila), but not on English elm and Scotch elm. If beetles are abundant during the first generation, little or no control should be expected the first year when banding more susceptible species such as English and Scotch elms; banding all nearby elms for several consecutive years can provide control after the first year of treatment.

Systemic Insecticides

Elm leaf beetle feeding can be controlled with certain systemic insecticides, including abamectin (Avid, Vivid II), acephate (Orthene), and imidacloprid (Bayer Advanced Tree & Shrub Insect Control, Imicide, Merit). Some formulations of these materials can be sprayed onto the tree foliage, but soil applications and tree injections (if labeled for this method of application) minimize environmental contamination and may be more effective than foliar sprays.

When using systemic insecticides, consider using a soil application whenever possible instead of spraying foliage or injecting or implanting trees. Injecting or implanting trunks or roots injures trees, and it is difficult to repeatedly place insecticide at the proper depth. Especially avoid methods that cause large wounds, such as implants placed in holes drilled in trunks. Do not implant or inject roots or trunks more than once a year.

Avoid methods that use the same device (such as drills or needles) to contact internal parts of more than one tree. Contaminated tools spread elm tree pathogens, including bacteria (such as slime flux or wetwood) and fungi (Dutch elm disease). Before moving to work on each new tree, consider cleaning and disinfecting tools to reduce the chance of spreading pathogens when injecting or implanting multiple elms. Before chemical disinfection, remove all plant material and scrub any plant sap from tools or equipment that penetrate trees. Bleach (and, to a lesser extent, certain other materials) can be effective disinfectants if applied to debris-free tools. At least 1 to 2 minutes of disinfectant contact time between contaminated uses is generally required. Consider rotating work among several tools, using a freshly disinfected tool while the most recently used tools are being soaked in disinfectant.

Imidacloprid is available to both home gardeners and professionals for application on or into soil beneath trees. The most effective time to apply it is early spring, just before new leaves emerge. Make an application before a rainfall, or follow the application with irrigation. Although efficacy is delayed until sometime after application, it usually is not necessary to treat 2 years in a row using this method. A major disadvantage of this timing is that treatment is made before beetles appear in spring, and before knowing whether insects and damage will be abundant enough to warrant control action. Consult the suggested criteria for help in deciding whether preventive treatment is warranted (Table 2). Soil applications are possible even if trees are surrounded by pavement. Depending on the product label directions, the insecticide can be applied to soil immediately adjacent to the trunk or nearby bare soil, lawn, or planting beds where most absorbing tree roots usually occur.

Foliar Sprays

Several foliar insecticide sprays are available for elm leaf beetle. Foliar spraying may be appropriate to supplement banding during the first year or two of treatment or when early-season beetle populations are high. The low-toxicity insecticide azadirachtin (Ornazin or Azatin) is a good choice in an integrated pest management program. More persistent, broad-spectrum materials, including carbaryl and pyrethroids, are also available for foliar application, but are generally not recommended because of their negative impact on natural enemies and their potential for environmental impacts in urban settings. Carefully time all foliar applications to target first- and second-instar larvae. Because specialized equipment is required to spray the tops of large elm trees, it is best to hire a professional applicator.

Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. tenebrionis (Btt) kills young beetle larvae and is the only truly selective insecticide. Unfortunately, no Btt products are currently (2004) available in California, although Btt (Novodor) is EPA registered for use in most states. Btt can be combined with narrow-range oil to kill beetle eggs and other elm pests such as scales. Btt is not toxic to people and most nontarget organisms, including natural enemies of the elm leaf beetle. Bt subspecies labeled for moth and butterfly caterpillars or mosquito larvae are not effective against elm leaf beetle.



Dahlsten, D. L., D. L. Rowney, and A. B. Lawson. 1998. IPM helps control elm leaf beetle. Calif. Agric. 52(2):18-24.

Dahlsten, D. L., S. M. Tait, D. L. Rowney, and B. J. Gingg. 1993. A monitoring system and developing ecologically sound treatments for elm leaf beetle. J. Arboriculture 19:181-186.

Dreistadt, S. H., J. K. Clark, and M. L. Flint. 2004. Pests of Landscape Trees and Shrubs: An Integrated Pest Management Guide. 2nd ed. Oakland: Univ. Calif. Agric. Nat. Res. Publ. 3359.

Dreistadt, S. H., D. L. Dahlsten, D. L. Rowney, S. M. Tait, G. Y. Yokota, and W. A. Copper. 1991. Treatment of destructive elm leaf beetle should be timed by temperature monitoring. Calif. Agric. 45(2):23-25.

Flint, M. L., S. H. Dreistadt, and J. K. Clark. 1998. Natural Enemies Handbook: The Illustrated Guide to Biological Pest Control. Oakland: Univ. Calif. Agric. Nat. Res. Publ. 3386.

Lawson, A. B., and D. L. Dahlsten. 2003. Evaluation of systemic insecticides as a treatment option in integrated pest management of the elm leaf beetle, Xanthogaleruca luteola (Müller) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 96(5):1455-1462.


[UC Peer Reviewed]

Pest Notes: Elm Leaf Beetle
UC ANR Publication 7403         PDF to Print

Authors: S. H. Dreistadt, UC IPM Program, UC Davis; D. L. Dahlsten, Biological Control, UC Berkeley; and A. B. Lawson, Entomology, CSU, Fresno
Produced by IPM Education and Publications, University of California Statewide IPM Program

PDF: To display a PDF document, you may need to use a PDF reader.

Top of page

Statewide IPM Program, Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California
All contents copyright © 2014 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.

For noncommercial purposes only, any Web site may link directly to this page. FOR ALL OTHER USES or more information, read Legal Notices. Unfortunately, we cannot provide individual solutions to specific pest problems. See our Home page, or in the U.S., contact your local Cooperative Extension office for assistance.

Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California

Accessibility   /PMG/PESTNOTES/pn7403.html revised: January 9, 2014. Contact webmaster.