|
|
How to Manage Pests
UC Pest Management Guidelines
Citrus
Texas Citrus Mite
Scientific Name:Eutetranychus banksi
(Reviewed 9/08,
updated 9/08)
In this Guideline:
|
|
|
Texas citrus mite is a sporadic pest of citrus in the inland valleys
of California. Adult mites are tan-to-brownish green with dark green to black
spots on the upper side of the body. Males are more slender
than females and have much longer legs. Females have a more round-to-oval shape and are
somewhat flatter than citrus red or Yuma spider mite. All stages of mites,
including eggs, tend to be located
along the midrib and lateral veins. Eggs are somewhat flat and disklike, are
not a uniform color, and range from yellow when laid to a reddish brown before
hatching.
In the San Joaquin Valley, Texas citrus mite can sometimes be
found in low populations in spring, especially following insecticides such as
formetanate hydrochloride (Carzol) or methidathion (Supracide) that disrupt
biological control. Populations of this mite decrease in summer but increase
from September through December. When weather becomes cold and wet, which
usually equates to the first overnight period of dense Valley fog, populations
decrease again.
Texas citrus mite feeds primarily on leaves and can cause
significant stippling and leaf drop; significant leaf drop can lead to fruit
drop. In the San Joaquin Valley damage is usually limited to early harvested
navels where a combination of warm temperatures in fall and deficit irrigation
(used to induce increases in sugar levels) allow mites to thrive. Damage often
begins in the tops of trees and progresses downward as harvest approaches. Leaf
drop from Texas citrus mite is unique because the leaf blade falls to the
ground while the petiole remains in the tree. Leaf drop can result in
sunburning of fruit, dropped fruit, and reduced photosynthesis.
In the San Joaquin Valley watch for Texas citrus mite in fall on
early harvested navels or in spring following treatments of broad-spectrum
insecticides. Treat if small amounts of defoliation begin to occur in the outer
canopy at the top of trees and cold, wet weather is not anticipated for a
period of weeks. Miticides are very effective against Texas citrus mite.
Biological
Control
Texas citrus
mite is naturally controlled by predators of other mites such as the sixspotted thrips (Scolothrips
sexmaculatus), the spider
mite destroyer (Stethorus picipes), minute
pirate bugs (Orius spp.) and a predatory
mite, (Euseius tularensis).
Cultural
Control
Adequate
irrigation and dust control will reduce the impact of Texas citrus mite.
Organically
Acceptable Methods
Cultural and
biological controls and certain petroleum oil sprays are organically acceptable
methods.
Monitoring and Treatment Decisions
In the San Joaquin Valley, check for Texas citrus mite during spring
if broad-spectrum insecticides such as formetanate hydrochloride (Carzol) or
methidathion (Supracide) have been used. Treat if significant amounts of leaf
drop occur.
In fall look for Texas citrus mite from September through
December on trees that bear early harvested fruit, especially navels. Treat if
leaves in the outer canopy at the tops of trees begin to defoliate, and cold
weather is not anticipated for a period of several weeks. Treatments are not needed
if defoliation is limited to the leaves on the extremities of the fall flush
that will naturally freeze or be pruned off during winter.
No official treatment thresholds exist. Texas citrus mite is
highly susceptible to all miticides labeled for control of citrus red mite and
can be controlled with relatively low volumes of water because of to its
tendency to be located on newer leaves in the outer tree canopy.
| Common name |
Amount to Use |
R.E.I.+ |
P.H.I.+ |
| (trade name) |
(type of coverage)** |
(hours) |
(days) |
|
| The following materials are listed in order of usefulness in an IPM program, taking into account efficacy and impact on natural enemies and honey bees. When choosing a pesticide, also consider information relating to environmental impact. Not all registered pesticides are listed. Always read label of product being used. |
| |
| A. |
NARROW RANGE OIL (92%UR) |
| |
(415, 440) |
1.2–1.4% (OC) |
4 |
when dry |
| |
. . . or . . . |
| |
NARROW RANGE OIL (99% UR) |
| |
(415, 435, 440, 455) |
1.2–1.4% (OC) |
4 |
when dry |
| |
RANGE OF ACTIVITY: Pests: broad (unprotected stages of insects/mites); Natural enemies: most |
| |
PERSISTENCE: Pests: short; Natural enemies: short |
| |
MODE OF ACTION: Contact including smothering and barrier effects. |
| |
COMMENTS: Use highest rate for July or August applications.
Narrow range 440 (or higher) spray oil is preferable in the Central Valley
during warmer months because of greater persistence, but risk of
phytotoxicity increases unless using products with 99% unsulfonated residues
(UR). Low-volume may be preferable. Caution: Serious hazards are associated with oil
treatments to green lemons because of phytotoxicity after sweating; check label for preharvest interval. |
| |
. . . or . . . |
| |
NARROW RANGE OIL (92 or 99% UR) |
| |
(415) |
6–20 gal/acre (LV) |
4 |
when dry |
| |
RANGE OF ACTIVITY: Pests: narrow (citrus red mite) Natural enemies: predatory mites |
| |
PERSISTENCE: Pests: short; Natural enemies: short |
| |
MODE OF ACTION: Contact including smothering and barrier effects. |
| |
COMMENTS: Use highest rate for July or August applications.
Low-volume may be preferable. Caution: Serious hazards are associated with oil
treatments to green lemons because of phytotoxicity after sweating; check label for preharvest interval. |
| |
| B. |
ACEQUINOCYL |
| |
(Kanemite) 15SC |
21–31 oz/acre (OC) |
12 |
7 |
| |
RANGE OF ACTIVITY: Pests: narrow (mites); Natural enemies: predatory mites |
| |
PERSISTENCE: Pests: intermediate; Natural enemies: intermediate |
| |
MODE OF ACTION GROUP NUMBER1: 20B |
| |
COMMENTS: For use on oranges, grapefruit, and lemons only.
Apply by ground using 100-250 gal water/acre. Do not use less than 100 gal
water/acre. Do not apply more than 62 oz/acre/season. Allow a minimum of 21 days between applications. |
| |
| C. |
PYRIDABEN |
| |
(Nexter) WSB |
Label rate (OC) |
12 |
7 |
| |
RANGE OF ACTIVITY: Pests: narrow (mites); Natural enemies: predatory mites |
| |
PERSISTENCE: Pests: intermediate; Natural enemies: intermediate |
| |
MODE OF ACTION GROUP NUMBER1: 21 |
| |
COMMENTS: When this material was used during April and May in
the San Joaquin Valley and thrips were abundant, there was an increase in scarring damage caused by thrips. Do not apply more than twice/year. |
| |
| D. |
FENPROXIMATE |
| |
(Fujimite) 5EC |
1–4 pt (OC or IC) |
12 |
14 |
| |
RANGE OF ACTIVITY: Pests: narrow (mites); Natural enemies: predatory mites |
| |
PERSISTENCE: Pests: intermediate; Natural enemies: intermediate |
| |
MODE OF ACTION GROUP NUMBER1: 21 |
| |
COMMENTS: Do not make more than 2 applications/season and allow 14 days between applications. Use allowed under a Supplemental Label. |
| |
| E. |
WETTABLE SULFUR# |
45–60 lb/acre (OC) |
24 |
0 |
| |
RANGE OF ACTIVITY: Pests: narrow (mites and citrus thrips); Natural enemies: most |
| |
PERSISTENCE: Pests: intermediate; Natural enemies: intermediate |
| |
MODE OF ACTION: Not available |
| |
COMMENTS: For use on all varieties. Apply from Oct. thru May
when monitoring indicates a need. Do not apply more than 6 lb/100 gal water.
Do not apply during or preceding high temperatures. Do not apply sulfur
within 2 months of a previous oil spray, and do not apply oil 60–90
days after a sulfur treatment. Not recommended for use in the San Joaquin Valley. |
| |
| F. |
FENBUTATIN OXIDE* |
| |
(Vendex) 50WP |
0.24–0.5 lb/100 gal (OC) |
48 |
7 |
| |
|
...or... |
|
| |
|
3 lb/acre (LV) |
|
| |
RANGE OF ACTIVITY: Pests: narrow (mites); Natural enemies: predatory mites |
| |
PERSISTENCE: Pests: short; Natural enemies: short |
| |
MODE OF ACTION GROUP NUMBER1: 12B |
| |
COMMENTS: For use on all varieties. This material does not work
well in cool weather and requires higher rates during these periods. Do not
apply more than 1,600 gal dilute spray/acre or use more than 4 lb/acre/season. |
| |
UC IPM Pest Management Guidelines: Citrus
UC ANR Publication 3441
Insects, Mites, and Snails
E. E. Grafton-Cardwell, Kearney Agricultural Center, Parlier
J. G. Morse, Entomology, UC Riverside
N. V. O‘Connell, UC Cooperative Extension, Tulare County
P. A. Phillips, UC IPM Program, UC Cooperative Extension, Ventura County
C. E. Kallsen, UC Cooperative Extension, Kern County
D. R. Haviland, UC Cooperative Extension, Kern County
Acknowledgments for contributions to Insect, Mites, and Snails:
J. Barcinas, E. S. I., Corona, CA
R. Dunn, Badger Farming County, Exeter, CA
J. Gorden, Pest Management Associates, Exeter, CA
H. Griffiths, E. S. I., Corona, CA
D. Machlitt, Consulting Entomology Services, Moorpark, CA
C. Musgrove, retired entomologist, Riverside, CA
K. Olsen, S & J Ranch, Pinedale, CA
T. Roberts, E. S. I., Corona, CA
J. Stewart, Pest Management Associates, Exeter, CA
P. Washburn, Washburn & Sons Citrus Pest Control, Riverside, CA
K. Godfrey, USDA Biological Control, Sacramento
D. Headrick, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
B. Faber, UC Cooperative Extension, Ventura County
J. Kabashima, UC Cooperative Extension, South Coast Research and Extension Center
Top of page
|