|
|
How to Manage Pests
UC Pest Management Guidelines
Cotton
Alfalfa and Cabbage Loopers
Scientific Names:
Alfalfa looper: Autographa californica
Cabbage looper: Trichoplusia ni
(Reviewed 1/08,
updated 1/08)
In this Guideline:
|
|
|
Alfalfa and cabbage loopers are quite similar in appearance. The
greenish larvae crawl by arching their bodies and are 1 to 1.5 inches long when
mature. Looper eggs are
similar to those of the
bollworm in that they are spherical with ridges radiating from top to bottom. However,
looper eggs are more flattened and have finer ridges radiating from the top to
the bottom. Alfalfa looper usually is found in May and early June while cabbage looper appears
in late June through September.
Loopers feed on leaves, but the resulting ragging of leaves is not
important unless it is very extensive (more than 50%) and occurs during
squaring. June defoliation is seldom sufficiently extensive to cause economic
damage to cotton.
Loopers are seldom numerous enough to cause significant damage and
are usually kept under control by natural enemies. Moderate populations of
loopers may be more beneficial than harmful, as they support populations of
natural enemies that also attack the more destructive bollworms, budworms, and
beet armyworms. In most cases, control is needed only where insecticides
applied for other pests have destroyed natural enemies; in the San Joaquin
Valley, populations of cabbage loopers often increase following treatment for
lygus bugs. Occasionally, however, widespread outbreaks occur, apparently as a
result of unusually favorable weather.
Biological Control
Many predators and parasites combine to substantially maintain looper
populations at low levels. The eggs and small larvae are attacked by bigeyed
bugs, minute pirate bugs, and other predators. Trichogramma parasites kill the eggs, and several other
parasites, especially Hyposoter exiguae and Copidosoma truncatellum,
attack the larvae. Loopers are also subject to a nuclear polyhedrosis virus
that can reduce populations rapidly.
Cultural Control
The use of Bt cotton will help prevent damage by loopers. A recently
developed transgenic cotton, Bollguard II, offers suppression of a broader
range of caterpillars than earlier Bt varieties and will also control
caterpillars such as beet armyworms, cotton bollworm, pink bollworm, and
tobacco budworm, which were not controlled by the earlier Bt varieties.
Organically Acceptable Methods
Biological control and sprays of Bacillus thuringiensis and the Entrust formulation of spinosad are acceptable
for use on organically grown cotton.
Monitoring
and Treatment Decisions
Damage by loopers is not important unless it is very extensive and
occurs when it will affect the supply of energy to fruit. During the most
vulnerable period, from first square to first open boll, plants can lose 20 to
25 percent of their leaf area without a reduction in yield. Before and after
this period, plants can tolerate a loss of about half of the leaf area.
When loopers are numerous, ragging of leaves is usually obvious,
and you will probably find the larvae while sweeping for lygus bugs or monitoring
for other pests. Smaller loopers feed on older leaves where they are easily
sampled using a beating sheet. Spread a 40-inch square piece of cloth between
two rows of cotton and vigorously shake an arm's length of plants from one row
onto the sheet. Lay the plants back and look for worms that are looping on the
cloth. There are no specific treatment thresholds for loopers. If you find
large numbers, check for signs of virus disease before applying an insecticide.
Insecticides used for control, including Bacillus thuringiensis, are effective mainly against young larvae. Spot
treatments are usually adequate for infestations on seedlings.
| Common Name |
Amount/Acre** |
R.E.I.+ |
P.H.I.+ |
| (trade name) |
|
(hours) |
(days) |
|
| The following materials are listed in order of usefulness
in an IPM program, taking into account efficacy, selectivity, persistence,
and impact on honey bees.
When choosing a pesticide, also consider information relating to environmental
impact. |
| |
| A. |
BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS ssp. KURSTAKI# |
| |
(various products) |
Label rates |
4 |
0 |
| |
SELECTIVITY: High |
| |
PERSISTENCE: Pest–Short; Natural Enemies–Short |
| |
MODE OF ACTION GROUP NUMBER1: 11.B2 |
| |
COMMENTS: Ground or air application. Not harmful to natural enemies. |
| |
| B. |
METHOXYFENOZIDE |
| |
(Intrepid) 2F |
4–10 fl oz |
4 |
14 |
| |
SELECTIVITY: High |
| |
PERSISTENCE: Pest–Moderate; Natural Enemies–Moderate |
| |
MODE OF ACTION GROUP NUMBER1: 18A |
| |
COMMENTS: An insect growth regulator. |
| |
| C. |
INDOXACARB |
| |
(Steward) |
Label rates |
12 |
14 |
| |
SELECTIVITY: Moderate |
| |
PERSISTENCE: Pest–Moderate; Natural Enemies–Moderate |
| |
MODE OF ACTION GROUP NUMBER1: 22 |
| |
| D. |
SPINOSAD |
| |
(Entrust)# |
1.25–2 oz |
4 |
28 |
| |
(Success) |
4–6 fl oz |
4 |
28 |
| |
SELECTIVITY: High |
| |
PERSISTENCE: Pest–Moderate; Natural Enemies–Short |
| |
MODE OF ACTION GROUP NUMBER1: 5 |
| |
COMMENTS: Use of Success allowed under a supplemental 24(c) label. |
| |
| E. |
NOVALURON |
| |
(Diamond) |
6–12 fl oz |
12 |
30 |
| |
SELECTIVITY: Moderate/High |
| |
PERSISTENCE: Pest–Moderate; Natural Enemies–Moderate |
| |
MODE OF ACTION GROUP NUMBER1: 15 |
| |
COMMENTS: A chitin inhibitor. |
| |
| F. |
ACEPHATE |
| |
(Orthene) 75S |
1.33 lb |
24 |
21 |
| |
SELECTIVITY: Low |
| |
PERSISTENCE: Pest–Moderate; Natural Enemies–Moderate |
| |
MODE OF ACTION GROUP NUMBER1: 1B |
| |
COMMENTS: Severe spider mite infestations may follow use as foliar spray. |
| |
| G. |
METHOMYL* |
| |
(Lannate) SP |
0.12–0.25 lb |
72 |
15 |
| |
SELECTIVITY: Low |
| |
PERSISTENCE: Pest–Short; Natural Enemies–Short |
| |
MODE OF ACTION GROUP NUMBER1: 1A |
| |
COMMENTS: Kills eggs and larvae. Use may redden cotton; do not
make more than 2 applications/season. Do not graze or feed cotton trash to livestock. |
| |
|
|
UC IPM Pest Management Guidelines: Cotton
UC ANR Publication 3444
Insects and Mites
L. D. Godfrey, Entomology, UC Davis
P. B. Goodell, UC IPM Program, Kearney Agricultural Center, Parlier
E. T. Natwick, UC Cooperative Extension, Imperial Co.
D. R. Haviland, UC IPM Program, Kern Co.
Acknowledgment for contributions to the insects and mites section:
E. E. Grafton-Cardwell, Kearney Agricultural Center, Parlier
N. C. Toscano, Entomology, UC Davis
Top of page
|