|
|
How to Manage Pests
UC Pest Management Guidelines
Grape
Webspinning Spider Mites
Scientific names:
Pacific spider mite: Tetranychus pacificus
Willamette spider mite: Eotetranychus willamettei
Twospotted spider mite: Tetranychus urticae
(Reviewed 6/06,
updated 10/08)
In this Guideline:
|
|
|
The Pacific spider mite is the primary pest mite species in the San
Joaquin Valley and may also be the primary pest mite in certain North Coast
grape-growing areas. Adult Pacific spider mite females vary from slightly amber
to greenish in color. Later in the season as they go into diapause or under
high population densities adult females can turn orange to reddish. Upon
emergence adult Pacific spider mites are almost void of food spots. As feeding
begins usually two large diffuse spots appear forward and two smaller spots
appear on the rear portion of the abdomen. Pacific spider mite prefers the
warmer upper canopy of the vine. Although it can cause damage early in the
season, Pacific spider mite generally prefers the hotter, dryer part of the
season. Because they are so similar in appearance, it is difficult to discern
between the Pacific and Willamette spider mites unless they are side-by-side.
The Pacific mite is larger in size than the Willamette mite. Pacific spider
mite forelegs are reddish in color and those of Willamette spider mite are
translucent to pale yellow.
The Willamette spider
mite is pale yellow. It is often considered an early-season mite. It prefers
the cooler parts of the plant and is found mostly in the shady parts of the
vine. In certain areas (e.g., North Coast) and during certain years,
populations can persist throughout the growing season. Willamette spider mite
is primarily a problem in the Salinas Valley and Sierra foothill production
areas where it can cause economic damage to varieties such as Zinfandel. In the
North Coast it can cause damage in early spring when shoot growth is delayed or
later in the season in vines with small canopies. Willamette spider mite is
seldom a pest in the San Joaquin Valley, especially on Thompson Seedless.
The twospotted spider
mite, Tetranychus urticae, is almost identical in
appearance to the Pacific spider mite except it rarely has spots on the rear of
the body. It is only occasionally found on grapes in California and rarely
causes damage.
Damage
caused by each species can help in
identifying each species. Pacific spider mite damage begins as yellow spots. As
damage progresses, dead (necrotic) areas appear on the leaves. High populations
can render the leaves unfunctional with leaf burning and bronzing and
copious amounts of webbing. Damage is worse along the shoulder and tops of the
vine canopies. Willamette spider mite feeding in mid- or late season causes
foliage to turn yellowish bronze, but usually no
burn occurs unless vines are weak. In red varieties, infested leaves may turn
reddish.
Manage webspinning spider mites in a vineyard by integrating
biological, cultural and chemical controls.
Biological Control
Many natural enemies help to control pest mite populations. The western
predatory mite, Galendromus (=Metaseiulus)
occidentalis, is commonly present in vineyards and can be quite
effective in reducing all stages of spider mite populations. This mite is
translucent to light amber, pear shaped, and quite active. The effectiveness of
this predator depends upon its ability to increase its population size as the
season progresses. Disruptive sprays applied early will reduce the survival of
this beneficial mite. Naturally occurring predator mites will survive sulfur
sprays and dusts, but released ones may not survive dusting sulfur unless they
have sulfur resistance. Predator mites, including insecticide-resistant ones,
are available commercially to augment populations in the field. Other
predators, including sixspotted thrips (Scolothrips sexmaculatus), can also
be important. To preserve these natural enemies, avoid using disruptive
materials, especially carbaryl, dimethoate, dicofol, and methomyl.
Cultural Control
Apply water or other materials formulated to reduce dust on roads in the
vineyard. If possible, maintain resident vegetation or other cover in the
vineyard middles to further reduce dust. Irrigate in a manner that will avoid
stressing vines. Although overhead watering has been shown to reduce mite
problems, it can also increase some disease problems.
Organically Acceptable
Methods
Organically acceptable methods include biological
and cultural control methods as well as oil or soap sprays.
Monitoring and Treatment Decisions
Monitor for webspinning spider mites as part of
dormant and budbreak spur monitoring as described in the DELAYED-DORMANT AND
BUDBREAK SAMPLING (wine/raisin grapes or table
grapes) and record
observations on a monitoring form (example
form—. During
rapid shoot growth, look for spider mites and predatory mites weekly on the
first emerging leaves. During bloom, follow the
guidelines for MONITORING
INSECTS AND SPIDER MITES. When monitoring
mites, note the presence of mite predators. The table below can be used in
determining the treatment guidelines for various combinations of Pacific mite
injury levels and predator-prey distributions in Thompson Seedless raisin
vineyards. After bloom, record your observations on the insect and mite monitoring
form (example form—.
| Pacific mite injury levels (% leaves infested) 1: |
Predator-prey distribution ratios for pacific
spider mites in Thompson Seedless raisin vineyards1 |
Rare
(less than 1:30) |
Occasional
(1:30 to 1:10) |
Frequent
(1:10 to 1:2) |
Numerous
(greater than 1:2) |
| light (less than 50%) |
delay treatment to increase predators |
delay treatment |
treatment not likely necessary |
treatment not necessary |
| moderate (50-65%) |
treat if population is increasing rapidly |
may delay treatment to increase predation |
treatment may not be needed if the predator-prey distribution ratio is increasing rapidly |
treatment not needed |
| heavy (65-75%) |
treat immediately |
may delay treatment a few days to take advantage of increasing predation |
treatment may not be needed if predators are becoming numerous |
treatment not needed, damage not increasing |
| very heavy (greater than 75%) |
treat immediately |
treat immediately |
teat immediately unless predator-prey distribution ratio increasing very rapidly; carefully evaluate damage |
treatment may not be necessary if
population is dropping because of very high (greater than 1:1) predator-prey distribution ratios; carefully evaluate damage |
| Common name |
Amount/Acre** |
R.E.I.+ |
P.H.I.+ |
| (trade name) |
|
(hours) |
(days) |
|
| The
following materials are listed in order of usefulness in an IPM program,
taking into account efficacy and impact on natural enemies
and honey bees. When choosing a pesticide, also
consider information relating to environmental impact. Not all registered pesticides are listed. Always read label of product being used. |
| |
| A. |
PROPARGITE |
| |
(Omite) 30WP |
5–9 lb |
see comments |
21 |
| |
MODE
OF ACTION GROUP NUMBER1: 12C |
| |
COMMENTS:
Apply no more than twice/season. Lower rates allow greater survival of
beneficials. Restricted entry interval is 14 days for wine and raisin grapes and 21 days for table grapes. |
| |
| B. |
FENBUTATIN-OXIDE* |
| |
(Vendex) 50WP |
1–2.5 lb |
48 |
28 |
| |
MODE
OF ACTION GROUP NUMBER1: 12B |
| |
COMMENTS:
Do not apply more than twice /season. Lower rates allow greater survival of beneficials. |
| |
| C. |
FENPYROXIMATE |
| |
(Fujimite) 5EC |
2pt |
12 |
14 |
| |
MODE
OF ACTION GROUP NUMBER1: 21 |
| |
COMMENTS:
Apply in 50-200 gal water with higher volumes in vineyards with dense canopies. |
| |
| D. |
PYRIDABEN |
| |
(Nexter) 75WP |
Label rates |
12 |
7 |
| |
(Pyramite) 60WP |
Label rates |
12 |
7 |
| |
MODE OF ACTION GROUP NUMBER1: 21 |
| |
COMMENTS:
Alternate with miticides of a different chemistry to minimize the development of resistance. |
| |
| E. |
ABAMECTIN* |
| |
(Agri-Mek) 0.15%EC |
8–16 fl oz |
12 |
28 |
| |
MODE
OF ACTION GROUP NUMBER1: 6 |
| |
COMMENTS:
Do not make more than 2 applications/growing season. Dust on leaves will
inhibit absorption of this material. Effectiveness is also reduced by sulfur burn on leaves. |
| |
|
| F. |
NARROW RANGE OIL# |
|
|
| |
(Saf-T-Side, etc.) |
Label rates |
4 |
0 |
| |
MODE OF ACTION: Contact including smothering and barrier effects. |
| |
COMMENTS:
For Pacific spider mite, apply before bloom to get the best coverage and to
delay the development of the population by 3–4 weeks. If an additional
treatment is needed, apply 2 weeks after berry set (on raisin and wine grapes
only; do not use on table grapes after bloom). For Willamette spider mite,
apply oil after budbreak in a 1% spray. Do not apply within 10 days of a
sulfur application. Check with certifier to determine which products are organically acceptable. |
| |
| G. |
INSECTICIDAL SOAPS# |
| |
(M-Pede) |
Label rates |
12 |
0 |
| |
MODE OF ACTION: Contact including smothering and barrier effects. |
| |
COMMENTS: Can cause berry spotting. |
| |
| H. |
NEEM OIL# |
| |
(Trilogy) |
Label rates |
4 |
0 |
| |
MODE OF ACTION: Unknown. A botanical insecticide |
| |
COMMENTS:
For organically grown crops, check with your certifier for any restrictions that apply. |
| |
| I. |
HEXYTHIAZOX |
| |
(Savey) 50DF |
3–6 oz |
12 |
|
| |
MODE
OF ACTION GROUP NUMBER1: 10B |
| |
COMMENTS:
For use on nonbearing vines only. Do not make more than 1 application per
year. More effective early in season on egg stage. If there is an abundance
of adults, this material is not effective. Because this material is applied early in the season, it is best used in vineyards with chronic mite problems. |
| |
| J. |
DICOFOL |
| |
(Kelthane) 50WSP |
2.5 lb |
48 |
7 |
| |
MODE OF ACTION: UNC |
| |
COMMENTS:
May not be effective in all areas due to resistance. Disruptive to predaceous mites and lady beetles. Do not make more than two applications per season. |
| |
| K. |
GALENDROMUS OCCIDENTALIS# |
| |
COMMENTS:
Releases are most successful when host plants (green beans) are placed directly on vines. Use a minimum of 1,000 predators per acre. |
| |
IMPORTANT LINKS
UC IPM Pest Management Guidelines: Grape
UC ANR Publication 3448
Insects and Mites
W. J. Bentley, UC IPM Program, Kearney Agricultural Research Center, Parlier
L. G. Varela, UC IPM Program, Sonoma County
F. G. Zalom, Entomology, UC Davis
R. J. Smith, UC Cooperative Extension, Sonoma County
A. H. Purcell, Environmental Science, Policy and Management, UC Berkeley
P. A. Phillips, UC IPM Program, Ventura County
D. R. Haviland, UC IPM Program, Kern County
K. M. Daane, Kearney Agricultural Research Center, Parlier
M. C. Battany, UC Cooperative Extension, San Luis Obispo County
Acknowledgment for contributions to Insects and Mites:
J. Granett, Entomology, UC Davis
Top of page
|