How to Manage Pests
UC Pest Management Guidelines
Peach
Rust
Pathogen: Transchelia discolor
(Reviewed 4/10,
updated 4/10)
In this Guideline:
|
|
|
Infections of young twigs and leaves are the most common symptoms of
rust, but in California, fruit infections may be a major component of the
disease as well.
Twig Cankers
Twig cankers are the
first symptoms of the disease in spring. Cankers develop after petal fall on
1-year-old fruiting wood. They appear as blisters and longitudinal splits in
the bark about 0.12 to 0.25 inches long. They can most easily be seen using a
20X hand lens.
Leaf Lesions
Leaf lesions usually
develop after cankers form in spring and may continue to develop through summer
and into fall. The lesions appear as bright yellow, angular spots on the
upper surface of leaves. The lower surface of the leaves contains brown spore
masses. A high incidence of early leaf infections may cause midseason
defoliation and numerous fruit infections at harvest. Early and severe
defoliation also may reduce yields and stimulate the production of new leaves
and buds late in the growing season.
Fruit Lesions
Fruit lesions may
develop during the growing season after leaf symptoms. They first develop as
small, brownish spots (.1 inch) with green halos on mature, yellow fruit. When
fruit reddens, lesion halos become greenish yellow. The lesions are sunken and
extend several millimeters into the fruit.
Transchelia discolor
survives in twig cankers or on other host parts, and airborne spores depend on
wetness for infection. This disease typically has been more prevalent on cling
varieties of peaches than on other varieties because the areas in which cling
peaches are grown tend to have higher rainfall, making conditions more
conducive to disease development. Fruit symptoms may resemble damage caused by
stink bugs; confirm rust by the presence of rust spores within the fruit lesion or by leaf or twig
symptoms.
In orchards where rust develops it is managed with a fungicide
treatment in spring. If the problem was severe the previous year, several
fungicide treatments may be necessary in spring as soon as the trees leaf out.
Because damp conditions favor rust development, angle sprinklers to avoid
wetting the foliage. Drip irrigation is the least favorable to development of
this disease because it doesn't increase the humidity in the orchard as much as
flood or furrow irrigation.
Examine fruit on trees every other week after color break (see PREHARVEST FRUIT SAMPLES) to
detect any developing problems in the orchard and take a fruit damage sample at
harvest to assess the effectiveness of the current year's IPM program and to
determine the needs of next year's program (see FRUIT
EVALUATION AT HARVEST). Record results for the harvest) sample.
Organically Acceptable
Methods
Sulfur treatments are acceptable for use in an organically certified
crop.
Chemical Control
To be effective, treatments must be applied before rust symptoms appear on
leaves. Examine one-year-old fruiting wood for small blisters or longitudinal
splits. If twig cankers are found and rain is forecasted, make a treatment. If
wet weather persists, additional applications may be necessary in late May or
early June. Disease severity in the preceding year is an important factor in
determining potential of disease during current year.
Treatment with sulfur is both cost-effective and efficacious. The
sterol inhibitors are also efficacious but more expensive than the sulfurs.
| Common name |
Amount to Use |
R.E.I.+ |
P.H.I.+ |
| (trade name) |
|
(hours) |
(days) |
|
| The following materials are listed within
groups in order of usefulness in an IPM program, taking into account efficacy. When choosing a pesticide, also consider information relating to
environmental impact. Not all registered pesticides are listed. Always
read label of product being used.
|
| |
| SULFUR TREATMENTS |
| A. |
WETTABLE SULFUR# |
18 lb/100 gal water |
see label |
see label |
| |
MODE OF ACTION GROUP NAME (NUMBER1): Multi-site contact (M2) |
| |
COMMENTS: Do not apply within 3 weeks of an oil application. |
| |
| B. |
WETTABLE SULFUR# |
| |
. . . PLUS . . . |
| |
LIQUID LIME SULFUR# |
Label rates |
see label |
see label |
| |
MODE OF ACTION GROUP NAME (NUMBER1): Multi-site contact (M2) |
| |
COMMENTS: Do not apply within 3 weeks of an oil application. |
| |
| C. |
LIQUID LIME SULFUR# |
6 gal/100 gal water |
see label |
see label |
| |
MODE OF ACTION GROUP NAME (NUMBER1): Multi-site contact (M2) |
| |
COMMENTS: Do not apply within 3 weeks of an oil application. |
| |
| D. |
SULFUR DUST# |
50 lb/acre |
see label |
see label |
| |
MODE OF ACTION GROUP NAME (NUMBER1): Multi-site contact (M2) |
| |
COMMENTS: Do not apply within 3 weeks of an oil application. |
| |
| STEROL INHIBITOR FUNGICIDES |
| A. |
TEBUCONAZOLE |
| |
(Elite, etc. 45WP) |
4–8 oz/acre |
12 |
0 |
| |
MODE OF ACTION GROUP NAME (NUMBER1): Demethylation inhibitor (3) |
| |
COMMENTS: Do not apply more than 3 lb/acre/season. |
| |
| B. |
PROPICONAZOLE |
| |
(Bumper, Tilt) |
4 oz/acre |
24 |
0 |
| |
MODE OF ACTION GROUP NAME (NUMBER1): Demethylation inhibitor (3) |
| |
COMMENTS: Maximum of 2 preharvest sprays. |
| |
| C. |
METCONAZOLE |
| |
(Quash) |
3.5–4 oz/acre |
12 |
14 |
| |
MODE OF ACTION GROUP NAME (NUMBER1): Demethylation inhibitor (3) |
| |
COMMENTS: Do not make more than 3 applications/season. |
| |
| STROBILURIN FUNGICIDE |
| A. |
AZOXYSTROBIN |
| |
(Abound) |
12.3–15.4 fl oz/acre |
4 |
0 |
| |
MODE OF
ACTION GROUP NAME (NUMBER1): Quinone outside inhibitor (11)
|
| |
COMMENTS: Do not apply more than two
applications before alternating with a fungicide that has a different mode of action group number. |
| |
| B. |
TRIFLOXYSTROBIN |
| |
(Gem) |
3.8 oz |
12 |
1 |
| |
MODE
OF ACTION GROUP NAME (NUMBER1): Quinone outside inhibitor (11)
|
| |
IMPORTANT LINKS
UC IPM Pest Management Guidelines: Peach
UC ANR Publication 3454
Diseases
J. E. Adaskaveg, Plant Pathology, UC Riverside
R. A. Duncan, UC Cooperative Extension Stanislaus County
J. K. Hasey, UC Cooperative Extension Sutter/Yuba counties
K. R. Day, UC Cooperative Extension Tulare County
Acknowledgment for contributions to Diseases:
W. D. Gubler, Plant Pathology, UC Davis
B. L. Teviotdale, Kearney Agricultural Center, Parlier
Top of page
|