UC IPM Home
Search
Home & garden Agriculture Natural environments Exotic & invasive
Weather data & products Degree-days Interactive tools & models
Natural enemies Weeds
Publications & more Workshops and events Training programs Pesticide information
Grants programs Funded-project results
Determine how giant reed excludes native species by quantifying its seasonal impact on the microclimate of invaded sites both with native species present and where native species have been excluded;
Combine data from Objectives 1 and 2 to test timing and levels of giant reed removal required to provide the necessary microclimate for native species restoration by natural or artificial means.
Maximum photosynthetic rates were comparable to that of highly productive C4 species, which explains the rapid growth rate and large biomass production of giant reed. Photosynthetic rates and water use efficiency were highest in March, and growth and biomass production increased from winter through summer when the highest growth rates occurred. Another experiment comparing nitrogen use of giant reed and the two native species showed that giant reed grew larger overall under both high and low nitrogen conditions.
However, willow benefited the most from added nitrogen, suggesting that giant reed removal could promote willow growth, particularly in areas near water containing nitrogen effluent.
Since field measurements indicated that the largest impact of giant reed on riparian habitats was reduction in light, an experiment was conducted to evaluate relative responses of the native species to shaded growth environments. Both species appeared to be relatively shade tolerant, making them good candidates for riparian restoration after suppression of giant reed. Results were used to design control treatments for giant reed that will alter the microenvironment to favor native species growth. Experiments testing various timings and levels of giant reed control are ongoing.
Experiments to quantify photosynthetic activity of giant reed, a C3 plant, showed that while activity slows in winter, no dormant period occurred in southern California. Maximum photosynthetic rates varied from 18 to 32 micromol CO2/m2/s depending on the season of measurement, which is comparable to that of highly productive C4 species. Photosynthetic rates and water use efficiency were highest in March, although growth and biomass production increased from winter through summer corresponding to the period of maximal growth.
Another experiment comparing nitrogen use of giant reed, and the two native species showed that giant reed grew larger overall under both high and low nitrogen conditions. However, willow benefited the most from added nitrogen, suggesting that giant reed removal could promote willow growth, particularly in areas near water containing nitrogen effluent. Since field measurements indicated that the largest impact of giant reed on riparian habitats was reduction in light, an experiment was conducted to evaluate relative responses of the native species to shaded growth environments. Both appeared to be relatively shade tolerant, making them good candidates for riparian restoration after suppression of giant reed. Using results from these experiments, giant reed control treatments will be tested that create a suitable microclimate for native species restoration.
Top of page